High Court single judge heard Criminal Application No. 2562 of 2013 and rejected it after finding no illegality or patent error in the lower court's order, noting no advocate appeared for the Applicants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
crapln2562.13
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
_____________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders |
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2562 OF 2013
ASHOK HARAKCHAND SANGHAVI AND OTHERS VERSUS
CHANDRAKANT SHRIRAM SHARMA AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Applicants : None. APP for Respondent State: Mr.S.R. Palnitkar.
CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.
Dated: October 24, 2013
P.C.:
None appears for the applicants, when called out.
2 Under the circumstances, the application is being decided after going through the same and after hearing Mr. Palnitkar, the learned Addl. P.P. for the State - respondent No.2.
crapln2562.13
2
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
_____________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders |
3 After going through the order passed by the revisional Court, I do not find any illegality or any patent error therein so as to need interference in the matter, by invoking the inherent powers of this Court.
4 Application is rejected.
(ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.)
PLK/*
ASHOK HARAKCHAND SANGHAVI AND OTHERS
CHANDRAKANT SHRIRAM SHARMA AND ANOTHER
ABHAY M. THIPSAY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
