The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Appellate Side, Bench at Aurangabad, allowed Criminal Application No. 2267 of 2013 and directed that an amendment be carried out forthwith in the proceedings.
Criminal Application allowed; amendment to be carried out forthwith.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
District : Aurangabad
Criminal Application No. 2267 of 2013 (In Criminal Revision Application No. 51 of 2011)
(Prakash s/o. Dattatraya Patki
Vs.
Mahadeo s/o. Limbaji (Limbraj) Pawar & another)
Appearances : Mrs. M.A. Kulkarni, Advocate, for the applicant.
Mr. S.G. Ladda, Advocate, for respondent no.1.
Mr. G.R. Ingole, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondent no.2.
CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.
DATE : 12TH NOVEMBER 2013
P.C. :
( ABHAY M. THIPSAY ) JUDGE
bgp/cria2267
Prakash s/o. Dattatraya Patki
Mahadeo s/o. Limbaji (Limbraj) Pawar
another
Abhay M. Thipsay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
