Allowed

The State of Mah v. Gulabrao Raosaheb Pawade and Ors.

Bombay HC10 Jun 2013APPLN/203/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad disposed of four criminal applications filed by the State seeking condonation of delay in filing appeals against various orders. The court perused the applications, considered the submissions, and allowed them, condoning the delay for the reasons stated in the applications.

What did the court decide?

Delay in filing appeals stood condoned; applications were allowed to the extent sought.

The State of Mah Vs Gulabrao Raosaheb Pawade… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2013)

¶1

1 A 202 of 2013

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

Criminal Application No.202 of 2013 In Criminal Application No.201 of 2013

¶4

The State of Maharashtra Through Police Station, Bhagyanagar, Nanded. .. Applicant.

¶5

Versus

¶6

Balasaheb @ Raju s/o Suryakant Pawade. .. Respondents.

¶7

Shri. V.H. Dighe, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the applicant. Shri. A.M. Gaikwad, Advocate, for the respondent.

¶8

With

¶9

Criminal Application No.203 of 2013 In Criminal Appeal Stamp No.16 of 2013

¶10

The State of Maharashtra Through Police Station, Bhagyanagar, Nanded. .. Applicant.

¶11

Versus

¶12

Gulabrao s/o Raosaheb Pawade And Others. .. Respondents.

¶13

Shri. V.H. Dighe, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the applicant. Shri. A.M. Gaikwad, Advocate, for respondent Nos.1 to 8.

¶14

2 A 202 of 2013

¶15

Criminal Application No.285 of 2013 In Criminal Application No.284 of 2013

¶16

The State of Maharashtra Through Police Station, Bhagyanagar, Nanded.

¶17

.. Applicant.

¶18

Versus

¶19

Haribhau Narayan Pawade & Others. .. Respondents.

¶20

Shri. V.H. Dighe, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the applicant. Shri. V.R. Dhorde, Advocate, for the respondents.

¶21

With

¶22

Criminal Application No.300 of 2013 In Criminal Appeal Stamp No.28 of 2013

¶23

The State of Maharashtra Through Police Station, Bhagyanagar, Nanded.

¶24

.. Applicant.

¶25

Versus

¶26

Maroti Narayan Pawade And Others.

¶27

.. Respondents.

¶28

Shri. V.H. Dighe, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the applicant. Shri. V.R. Dhorde, Advocate, for respondents.

¶29

CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ. DATE : 10^th JUNE 2013

¶30

3 A 202 of 2013

¶31

ORDER:

¶32

Heard.

¶33

The respondents are served. The State seeks condonation of delay in filing appeals.

¶34

We have perused the applications and considered the submissions advanced. For the reasons stated in the applications the delay stands condoned. The applications are allowed to the said extent.

¶35

Sd/- Sd/- (A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.)

¶36

rsl

The State of Mah v. Gulabrao Raosaheb Pawade and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The State of Mah v. Gulabrao Raosaheb Pawade and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The State of Mah Vs Balasaheb@Raju Suryakant Pawade

The State of Mah Vs Haribhau Narayan Pawade and Ors.

The State of Mah Vs Maroti Narayan Pawade and Anr.