In CriminalApplicationNo.1773of2013, the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court dismissed the applicant's plea. The A.P.P. confirmed a charge-sheet filed in2004 after taking on record a 2013 communication; finding no warrant for interference, the application was rejected.
Criminal application dismissed; no relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cra1773.13
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1773 OF 2013
(Ganesh Panditrao Gadadhe vs. State of Maharashtra & anr.)
Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s Orders
Memoranda of Coram,
appearances,Court’s
orders or directions
and Registrar’s orders.
Shri.S.S. Londhe Advocate for Applicant.
Smt.A.V. Gondhalekar, A.P.P. for Resp. No.1.
....
CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND
A.V. NIRGUDE, JJ.
DATE : 24TH APRIL, 2013
1. Heard.
2. The learned A.P.P. on instructions,
submits that in respect of the subject crime,
a charge-sheet has already been filed in the
year 2004. A communication dated 17th April
2013, made by the A.P.I, Basamba Police
Station addressed to the learned A.P.P. is
taken on record and marked as "X" for
identification.
cra1773.13
2
Office Notes, Office
Memoranda of Coram,
appearances,Court’s
orders or directions
and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s Orders
3. The learned counsel for the Applicant
submits that copy of charge-sheet is not
served on the Applicant.
4. In view of the statement made by the
learned A.P.P., no interference is warranted.
The Criminal Application is dismissed.
[A.V. NIRGUDE,J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.]
asb/APR13
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere when the charge-sheet was not served on the applicant despite a charge-sheet being filed.
Whether a communication from the A.P.I. addressed to the A.P.P. warrants interference in the proceedings.
Ganesh Panditrao Gadadhe
State of Maharashtra
anr.
NARESH H. PATIL
A.V. NIRGUDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court