The High Court rejected the State's Criminal Application for leave to appeal against an acquittal in a motor accident case. FINDINGS: The trial court correctly identified inconsistencies in the FIR and evidence regarding vehicle identification.
Leave to file appeal refused; Criminal Application disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cri.Appln.No.1614/2012
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1614 OF 2012
The State of Maharashtra ... APPLICANT VERSUS Ranjeet Baban Hake ... RESPONDENT
Shri S.G. Nandedkar, A.P.P. for applicant Shri A.S. Usmanpurkar, Advocate for respondent
CORAM: A.I.S. CHEEMA, J. DATED: 2nd September, 2013.
PER COURT :
Cri.Appln.No.1614/2012
2
learned counsel for the respondent/ accused. Perused the impugned judgment.
Cri.Appln.No.1614/2012
3
alleged incident, complainant saw towards the jeep and took note of the number of the jeep. The trial Court observed that, what was the registration number of the jeep is very much vague and suspicious. It has also been observed that, both the witnesses have not identified the accused to be the driver in clear terms.
fmp/cri1614.12
2 issues framed by the court
Whether leave to file appeal against acquittal should be granted as evidence was not properly considered.
Whether the trial Court's observation regarding vague registration number and lack of identification of accused is supported.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The State of Maharashtra
Ranjeet Baban Hake
A.I.S. Cheema
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
