Vivek Vishnu Kapse v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
In Criminal Appeal No. 157 of 2013, the High Court refused to cancel bail granted to respondents even though the applicant contended the original bail order was flawed. The court imposed area restriction and reporting conditions.
What did the court decide?
Bail not cancelled; respondents restricted from Pimpri/Chinchwad area for 1 year and required to report to trial court monthly.
What the court decided
35-APPLN-157-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.157 OF 2013
SHRI VIVEK VISHNU KAPSE )...APPLICANT V/s. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. )...RESPONDENTS
Mr.Satyavrat Joshi i/b. Mr.Subhash Hulyalkar Advocate for the Applicant.
Mrs.G.P.Mulekar APP for the State.
Mr.H.V.Akolkar i/b. Mr.Rohan Nahar Advocate for the Respondent Nos.3, 4, 5, 6 and 7,
CORAM: ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.
DATE : 19th JUNE, 2013.
P.C. :
1 Heard Mr.Satyavrat Joshi, the learned counsel for the applicant, and Mr.H.V.Akolkar, the learned counsel for the respondent nos.3, 4, 5, 6 and 7.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be cancelled despite submission of fresh conditions regarding area restrictions.
Whether the trial court needs to expedite the trial within one year.
Whether respondents must report to the trial court monthly regardless of trial fixation.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Shri Vivek Vishnu Kapse
- respondent
State of Maharashtra
Coram
Abhay M. Thipsay
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court