Applicants seeking to amend pending applications and place documents on record for final hearing were allowed only prayed amendments.
The applications are allowed in terms of respective prayer clause 'A' only.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1205 OF 2013 IN APPLN/3060/2006
WITH
APPLN/1206/2013 IN APPLN/3061/2006
RASANA RAMESH DEHADKAR AND ANOTHER VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. S.M. Kulkarni APP for Respondents: Mr. V.P.Kadam Mr. P B Patil advocate for respondent no.2.
CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. Dated: October 15, 2013
P.C. :-
aaa/-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1205 OF 2013 IN APPLN/3060/2006
( ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. )
aaa/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicants' prayer to amend applications and place documents on record can be allowed.
Rasana Ramesh Dehadkar and Another
The State of Maharashtra and Another
Abhay M. Thipsay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
