Dismissed
Anil Ranchod Chaudhari and Ors. v. the State of Mah and Ors.
Bombay HCAPPLN/1202/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
7 appln.1202.10
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1202 OF 2012
IN REVN/20/2012
ANIL RANCHOD CHAUDHARI AND OTHERS VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. R.R.Mantri.
APP for Respondent : Mr. G.R.Ingole. Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. R.C.Patil.
CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. DATE : 23rd September, 2013.
P.C.:
. Mr. R.R.Mantri, learned counsel for the Applicants submits that in view
of the objections raised by the learned counsel for the Respondents, the Applicants have now filed a fresh revision application for condonation of delay, and as such, the Applicants do not wish to press the present application.
[ ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. ]
ndm
Anil Ranchod Chaudhari and Others
The State of Maharashtra and Others
Abhay M. Thipsay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court