In criminal application no. 112 of 2013 regarding anticipatory bail, the applicant sought to withdraw the case. The application was disposed of as withdrawn upon the applicant's request.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 cri.appln 112-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 112 OF 2013
Khalid Jamil Vanjara
.. Applicant
Vs.
Mr.Aboobaker Hussain Khidir & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Murtaza Najmi i/b. Mr. Yakub sPhaikh for the Applicant.
Mr. Vikas Singh i/b. M/s. Lambay & Co. for Respondent Nos.1 to 4.
Mr. J. P. Kharge, APP for Respondent No.5.
CORAM : A. H. JOSHI,J.
DATED : 12TH APRIL, 2013.
1 Investigating Officer who is present in Court states that he wants that accused should come to the police station for giving specimen of handwriting / signature.
2 Advocate Mr. Vikas Singh who represents respondent nos.1 to 4 states that respondents would appear before the Investigating Officer and co-operate in the matter of taking the samples of handwriting for comparison.
3 Investigating Officer states that the investigation would be completed within two weeks and the charge sheet would be filed soon. In the background, that filing of charge sheet is in the process, no purpose would be served by setting aside
2 cri.appln 112-2013
the order of granting anticipatory bail particularly when investigation is almost completed.
4 Advocate for the applicant states that he would like to withdraw the case.
5 Application is disposed of as withdrawn.
(A. H. JOSHI, J.)
Khalid Jamil Vanjara
Mr.Aboobaker Hussain Khidir & Ors.
A. H. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
