Single judge dismissed the criminal appeal held that findings of appellate court regarding evidence on cheque transactions were not perverse and no interference was called for.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cr appln 1058-11
smt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1058 OF 2011 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 205 OF 2007
Mrs. Kanta Devraj Saxena .. Applicant. Vs.
Sou. Shaila Dnyaneshwar Vetal and anr.
.. Respondents.
Mr. Ashok B. Tajane, for the Applicant. Mr. Vikram R. Chavan, for the Respondent No.1. Mr. V.B. Konde Deshmukh, for the Respondent No.2.
CORAM : A. H. JOSHI, J.
DATED : 8TH OCTOBER, 2013.
1/1
Mrs. Kanta Devraj Saxena
Sou. Shaila Dnyaneshwar Vetal and anr.
A. H. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
