The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed two criminal applications (Crl. Aps. 864 of 2009 and 1809 of 2012) as the learned counsel for the applicant did not press for the relief sought.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pdp
appa-864-09 & 1809-12
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 864 OF 2009 AND CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1809 OF 2012 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 892 OF 2005
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mr. Nitin Sejpal and Ms. Pooja Bhojne for appellant. Mr. H. J. Dedhia, APP for State.
CORAM : P. V. HARDAS AND MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ.
DATE : NOVEMBER 11, 2013.
P.C.:
Learned counsel for the applicant does not
press for the relief prayed for in these applications.
Applications are accordingly dismissed.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.) (P.V. HARDAS, J.)
P. V. Hardas
Mridula Bhaktar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
