This single paragraph order allowed the criminal application and condoned a delay of 346 days in filing an appeal. The High Court recorded brief hearing of counsel.
Condonation of a delay of 346 days in filing a criminal appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
appa.539.13.doc
1
SQP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.539 OF 2013
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL (STAMP) NO.393 OF 2013
Bhim Bahadur Vishal Vishwakarma ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Ms.Sarojini Upadhyay, appointed Advocate for Applicant
Mr. V.B. Konde-Deshmukh, A.P.P. for Respondent-State
CORAM:- P.V.HARDAS AND
REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ. DATED:- JULY 25, 2013
P.C.
delay of 346 days in filing an appeal challenging his conviction. We have heard learned Counsel appointed for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. and for the reason stated in the application, application is allowed and the
delay is condoned.
(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.) (P.V.HARDAS, J.)
1/1
SQ Pathan
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 346 days in filing the criminal appeal can be condoned.
Bhim Bahadur Vishal Vishwakarma
The State of Maharashtra
P.V. Hardas
Revathi Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
