The Bombay High Court dismissed an application seeking suspension of imprisonment and bail pending appeal in a murder case. The court held that the prosecution evidence, including child witness testimony and dying declarations, was sufficient for conviction.
Application for suspension of substantive sentence and enlargement on bail dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PPD
1
17.appa.36-13.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.36 OF 2013 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.120 OF 2013
SITARAM DADA SARODE ..APPLICANT VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT
Miss. Deepa Matwankar, Advocate for the Applicant. Dr. F.R. Shaikh, APP, for the Respondent – State.
CORAM : P.V. HARDAS, & A.R. JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : 02nd APRIL, 2013
P.C.
1 / 2
2
17.appa.36-13.doc
(A. R. JOSHI, J.)
2 / 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the application for suspension of substantive sentence and enlargement on bail during pendency of appeal is maintainable.
Whether the prosecution evidence consisting of child witness testimony and dying declarations proves the offence beyond reasonable doubt.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sitaram Dada Sarode
The State of Maharashtra
P.V. Hardas
A.R. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
