The court considered an application seeking condonation of a 32-day delay in filing an appeal challenging the applicant's conviction. The court examined the reasons provided and allowed the application, condoning the delay.
Condonation of 32 days delay in filing appeal allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1 (906)APPA-283-13
Tilak
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.283 of 2013 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL ST.No.190 of 2013
Rupesh Kisan Khopade ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Mr.Shailesh Chavan, Advocate for the applicant. Mr.F.R.Shaikh, APP for the State.
CORAM : P.V.HARDAS AND
ABHAY M. THIPSAY, JJ.
DATED : MARCH 07, 2013
P.C.
1 By this application, the applicant/accused seeks condonation of delay of 32 days in filing an appeal challenging his conviction.
2 We have heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP on behalf of the State, and for the reasons stated in the application, application is allowed and delay is condoned.
( ABHAY M.THIPSAY,J )
(P.V.HARDAS,J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 32 days in filing the appeal against conviction required condonation and if it should be allowed.
Rupesh Kisan Khopade
The State of Maharashtra
P.V.HARDAS
ABHAY M. THIPSAY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
