Shamim Anwar Khan v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court dismissed Criminal Appeal No. 1149 of 2006 as not pressed because the applicant chose not to participate in the proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPA 164.13.sxw
1
JPP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 164 OF 2013 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1149 OF 2006
Shamim Anwar Khan.
... Applicant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra.
... Respondent.
Mr. V.C. Arya for the Applicant/Appellant. Mr. H.J. Dedhia, APP for the State.
CORAM : P.V. HARDAS &
A.M. THIPSAY, JJ.
FEBRUARY 26, 2013.
P.C. :-
The learned Counsel for the Applicant states on instructions that the Applicant does not press for the relief prayed for in this Application. Accordingly, this Application is dismissed as not pressed.
(A.M. THIPSAY, J.)
(P.V. HARDAS, J.)
Shamim Anwar Khan
The State of Maharashtra
P.V. Hardas
A.M. Thipsay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court