Dismissed
Rajnikant Robert Slavi and Ors. v. Sweta Chetan Kothari and Ors.
Bombay HCAPL/167/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
vrd 1 APL167/13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.167 OF 2013
Rajnikant R. Salvi and ors.
...Applicants
v/s
Smt Sweta Chetan Kothari and ors. ...Respondents
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.170 OF 2013
Rajnikant R. Salvi and ors. ...Applicants
v/s
Smt Kajal Ujjwal Sarin and ors. ...Respondents
Mr P.D. Varghese for Applicants.
Mr Amit Sheth for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Mr D.R. More, APP for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL J.
DATED : 05TH AUGUST 2013.
P.C.:-
1.Heard. Learned counsel for original
complainant, waives service in criminal application
No.170 of 2013. Proceedings under sections 138 and
141 of Negotiable Instruments Act are questioned.
After arguing for some time, having pointed that no
vrd 2 APL167/13
revision is preferred, the learned counsel, on
instructions, withdraws both the applications.
Permitted. Time spent before this Court in
prosecuting the matter may be considered by the
learned Judge while excusing the delay if revisions
are preferred. Applications are dismissed as
withdrawn.
( K.U. CHANDIWAL J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajnikant R. Salvi and ors.
Smt Sweta Chetan Kothari and ors.
Smt Kajal Ujjwal Sarin and ors.
K.U. CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court