The single-judge High Court bench allowed the criminal appeal relying on a prior judgment. The impugned judgment of the trial court was quashed and the case was remanded for fresh hearing and disposal on merits.
Impugned judgment and order quashed and set aside; case remanded to trial court for hearing on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
jsn
Cr.App.128_1998
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.128 OF 1998
Shri Prabhakar Digambar Kashikar ... Appellant Vs. M/s. Umedmal Punamchand & Co. & Ors. ... Respondents
R.M. Pethe, Adv. for the Appellant
Ms. A.A. Mane, APP & V.B. KondeDeshmukh, APP for the State.
CORAM : A. H . JOSHI, J. DATE : 24th October, 2013.
P.C. :
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal filed by the appellant should be allowed based on the judgment in Appeal No.87 of 1998.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
A.A. Shaikh Vs. M/s. Motilal Bafna & Co.Followed¶1
A.A. Shaikh Vs. M/s. Motilal Bafna & Co.
Shri Prabhakar Digambar Kashikar
M/s. Umedmal Punamchand & Co.
A. H. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
