The applicant in this anticipatory bail application appeared and expressed that the court was not inclined to grant relief. He sought liberty to withdraw. The application was disposed of as withdrawn with the court's observation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
sbw
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.936 OF 2013
Ganesh Mohan Patil
...Applicant
vs.
State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr. Karan Bhosale i/b.Sachin H. Deokar for the Applicant. Ms. A. A. Mane, APP, for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : A. H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 10th October, 2013
1] At the end of hearing, learned advocate for the applicant states that Court is not inclined to grant any relief, the learned advocate for the applicant has taken instructions and seeks liberty to withdraw the application. 2] Application is disposed of as withdrawn with above observation.
( A. H. JOSHI, J.)
wadhwa
Ganesh Mohan Patil
State of Maharashtra
A. H. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
