An application for anticipatory bail was dismissed on the day of hearing because the applicant's counsel stated they had instructions to withdraw the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
sbw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.40 OF 2013
Mr. Naveen D’souza & ors. ...Applicants
vs.
The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr. M. S. Mohite a/w Subodh Desai i/b. MZM Legal, Advocate, for the Applicant.
Mr. J. P. Yagnik, APP, for the Respondent – State. Mr. P. Y. Shankar, Advocate for the Original Complainant. Ms. R. R. Dhuru, Advocate for the Intervener.
CORAM : A. H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 16th APRIL, 2013
1] At the end of hearing, learned advocate for the applicants states that he has instructions to withdraw the application.
2] Application is dismissed as withdrawn.
wadhwa
Naveen D'souza & ors.
State of Maharashtra
A. H. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
