This court dismissed an anticipatory bail application filed by an accused shown as absconding in the charge sheet. The court held that the applicant could have applied for bail before the same court, and thus no indulgence was granted, leading to dismissal of the application.
The anticipatory bail application is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
sbw
p6.aba1155.13
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1155 OF 2013
Rashida Aquil Shaikh @ Munni ...Applicant vs. State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr. Sandeep Singh for the Applicant. Ms. A. A. Mane, APP, for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : A. H. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 15th October, 2013
wadhwa
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to an accused who is absconding and has appeared in court.
Whether indulgence is permissible when the application for bail before the same court is available.
Rashida Aquil Shaikh @ Munni
State of Maharashtra
A. H. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
