Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Sadanand S.Shet Vs Nitin N.Mehta — Property and Title | Bombay HC (2013)

Home
Bombay HC
2013
Sadanand S.Shet Vs Nitin N.MehtaSadanand S.Shet v. Nitin N.Mehta

Disposed

Sadanand S.Shet v. Nitin N.Mehta

Bombay HC10 Apr 2013S/4593/2000

Case brief

from the order text

What is this about?

mnm IN THE HIGH COURT

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

A

S.4593/2000(901)

1

mnm

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

SUIT NO. 4593 OF 2000

Sadanand S. Shet ...Plaintiff

Vs.

Nitin Nagarji Mehta ...Defendant

Ms. Apeksha Sharma i/b. Kadam & Co., for Plaintiff Ms. Seema S. Singh for Defendant Defendant present

Mr. ajanan Surve representative of the Court Receiver present

CORAM : MRS. ROSHAN DALVI, J. DATED : 10^TH APRIL, 2013

P.C. :

Parties & counsel

AI extract

respondent
Nitin Nagarji Mehta

Coram

AI extract

Roshan Dalvi

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Bombay HC
Decided on: 10 Apr 2013 · April
Registered: 3 Nov 2000
Case no.: S/4593/2000

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from R.s. Dalvi

Rachana S. Shah and 2 Ors. Vs Janak B. Shah and 5 Ors.
9 Apr 2013
Mrs. Batul Viraf Aga Vs Mr. Viraf Abbasali Aga
8 Apr 2013
Mrs. Neeta Sarda and 2 Ors. Vs Mr. Prabhakar Kabra and 2 Ors.
8 Apr 2013
Maruf Arif Bhati Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
10 Apr 2013

Cite this judgement

Sadanand S.Shet v. Nitin N.Mehta, S/4593/2000 (BOM), decided on 10 April 2013.

The Bombay High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

Roshan Dalvi

Parties & counsel

Disposed

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

There shall be an order and decree in terms of the consent

terms signed by the parties and their Advocates.

The Advocates identify the signatures of their respective clients. The undertakings in the consent terms are accepted. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked “X” for identification.

The defendant who is present agrees that the suit flat be handed over by the Court Receiver to the plaintiff. The Court Receiver shall stand discharged upon such handing over without

S.4593/2000(901)

2

passing any accounts and upon payment of his costs, charges and expenses by the plaintiff.

The plaintiff shall pay Court Receiver's costs, charges and expenses before he is handed over the possession.

Parties to act on the copy of this order duly uploaded.

(ROSHAN DALVI, J.)

CNR

HCBM020079122000

Topic

Property and Title

Bench

Zulkrnain M. Kagalwalla Vs Mumtaz Hussain M. Kagalwala and 2 Ors.

10 Apr 2013

Bakulesh D. Sanghavi Vs Hiralaxhmi D. Sanghavi and 3 Ors.

10 Apr 2013