This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S 4204 of 2000
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICTURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO.4204 of 2000
American Home Products Corporation and Anr. .....Plaintiffs Versus Soul Marketing Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. .....Defendants
Ms. Megha Dhuri i/by Ms. Rani Boazz, for Plaintiffs. Ms. Seema Dholam i/by Mr. Mahesh A. Mahadgut, for Defendant Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM: S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.
DATE: 3 rd MAY 2013
P.C. :
(i) The Defendants undertake to use the mark “ANNEX” only for
its products set out in paragraph 7 of the Written Statement. The undertaking is accepted.
(ii) The Defendants undertake to use the mark “ Annex ” on their
products as set out in their Brochure at Page 45 of the Plaint and not in any other style/manner and further undertake not to use the word
1/2
ssp
S 4204 of 2000
“French” or any other word along with their mark “Annex” used on their products. The undertakings are accepted.
(iii) The Plaintiffs are not pressing for any costs and/or damages.
(iv) The Suit is accordingly disposed of. Refund of Court Fees, if
any, as per rules.
( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )
2/2
ssp
S.J.Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
