This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
sk
1
wp99.12
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.99 OF 2012
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr.S.V.Pitre i/b. Mr.Manoj Wadekar & Associates for the petitioner. Ms M.P.Thakur, A.G.P. For resp.nos.1 & 3 to 5.
CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : JANUARY 12, 2012. P.C.:
Mr.Pitre, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that due to efflux of time, the cause of action involved in the present petition no more survives. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous.
(D.D. SINHA, J.)
(SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)
Petitioner
Respondents 1, 3 to 5
D.D. SINHA
V.K.TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
