A deemed university informed the petitioner to be present for college admissions. Undertakings were accepted regarding admission status and fee payment. The court disposed of the writ petition.
Original documents of the petitioner shall be returned forthwith; undertaking accepted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 of 2 WP.9223.2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.9223 OF 2012
Sashmi Bharat Pandya Petitioner versus
Pravesh Niyantran Samiti and others Respondents
Mr.A.A.Kumbhakoni with Mr.Shardul Singh i/by Mr.Vaibhav Gaikwad for Petitioner. Ms.S.S.Bhende, AGP for Respondents 2 and 3. Mr.R.R.Bhosale for Respondent no.6.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD AND A.A.SAYED, JJ.
DATE : 27 September 2012
PC :
2 of 2 WP.9223.2012
and that in the event that the seat which was allotted to the Petitioner remains unfilled with the Sixth Respondent, the father of the Petitioner (who is present in the Court) undertakes to pay the fees for the entire duration of the course to the Sixth Respondent. The undertakings are accepted.
(DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.)
(A.A.SAYED, J.)
MST
Sashmi Bharat Pandya
Pravesh Niyantran Samiti
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD
A.A.SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
