been completed and the accused have been arrested and Panchanama of the said vehicle was done by the Police. Hence, the petitioner filed Misc. Criminal Application No. 141/2012 before learned Judicial Magistrate (F.C.), Basmath, under Section 457 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and prayed to release the said vehicle on Supurtnama. However, learned Judicial Magistrate (F.C.), rejected the said application by order dated 13-7-2012, on the ground that the offence was registered under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code which was triable by the Court os Sessions. Hence, being aggrieved and dissatisfied by the said order, the petitioner herein preferred Criminal Revision Petition No. 16/2012 before learned Additional Sessions Judge, Basmathnagar, on 23rd August 2012. However, even the said revisional court also dismissed the said revision of the petitioner, observing that the said vehicle was used in commission of the offence of murder of one Sachin, and said Sachin was lifted from Aurangabad and his murder was committed in the said vehicle, and then he was brought in that vehicle within the area of Basmath Tahsil. Accordingly, murder of said Sachin was committed in the said jeep itself. At the time of committing murder of said Sachin, cushion of the vehicle was cut at some places which is important piece of evidence, and if the said vehicle is released in favour of the petitioner, certainly part of evidence would be destroyed and the possibility of changing interior of the jeep by the petitioner was not ruled out.
