The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Appellate Side, Bench at Aurangabad) disposed of a motion on minutes involving four writ petitions without granting any relief.
Motion disposed with direction to meet minutes; no speaking order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
Writ Petition No.3914 of 2011 Writ Petition No.4898 of 2011 Writ Petition No.8155 of 2011 Writ Petition No.8963 of 2011
DISTRICT:NANDED
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s order appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Mr. Anil Kasliwal (Jain), Advocate, for petitioners. Mr. D.R. Korde, AGP, for the respondents. ----------- Coram: NARESH H PATIL & T.V. NALAWADE, JJ. Date: 25th January 2012 -------1) Heard. 2) No interference is warranted for speaking to the minutes. The motion is disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- (T.V. NALAWADE, J.) ( NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl
NARESH H PATIL
T.V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
