This writ petition challenging a mutation order was disposed of dismissing the petition on the basis that an alternate remedy was available to the petitioner.
PETITIONER WAS PROHIBITED FROM AVAILING ANY OTHER RELIEF IN THIS COURT AND DIRECTED TO AVAIL THE ALTERNATE REMEDY AVAILABLE IN LAW.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 756 OF 2012
Ashfaq Abdul Shaikh Vs
State of Maharashtra & Ors
.. Petitioner
.. Respondents
Mr. Ramesh Dube - Patil i/b M/s. Jay & Co for the Petitioner
Ms. M.P. Thakur, AGP for the State
CORAM : D. D. SINHA &
SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ
DATE : 28th FEBRUARY, 2012.
P.C.:
1. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties.
3. In view of alternate remedy available to the petitioner in law, we are not inclined to show any indulgence in this petition, hence, Writ Petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail alternate remedy available in law.
[ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J ] [ D. D. SINHA, J ]
Amberkar
1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the matter can be disposed of on the ground of alternate remedy available in law in a writ petition seeking mutation of land record.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ashfaq Abdul Shaikh
State of Maharashtra
D. D. SINHA
V.K. TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
