The High Court of Judicature at Bombay disposed of two writ petitions by stating the issues were covered by a prior judgment. No substantive decision or reasoning was provided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rpa
wp7265-66-12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 7265 OF 2012
Rajgonda Aanna Patil .. Petitioner V/s. Shamrao Vithal CoOp. Bank Ltd. .. Respondent
ALONGWITH
WRIT PETITION NO.7266 OF 2012
Sou Seema Rajendra Koli .. Petitioner V/s. Shamrao Vithal CoOp. Bank Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr. M. S. Topkar with Ms. Pavitra Manesh for the Petitioner. Mr. D. J. Bhange and Mr. Mayur Joglekar for Respondent – Bank.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE : 30th AUGUST, 2012.
P.C.
Both the counsel fairly stated that the issue is covered by the Judgment dated 25th July, 2012, passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.3574 of 2004 and other connected Writ Petitions, present Writ Petitions are, also therefore, disposed of in view of the same.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P. No. 3574 of 2004 dated 25th July, 2012Referred¶12
Rajgonda Aanna Patil
Sou Seema Rajendra Koli
Shamrao Vithal Co-Op. Bank Ltd.
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
