The High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Bench dismissed Writ Petition No. 68 of 2001 in default due to the petitioner's non-appearance after receiving a last chance to argue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 68 OF 2001
Dr. Sandip s/o Suryabhanji Alone
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and four others
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders.
Mr. A. S. Bhandarkar, Advocate for the petitioner
Coram : P. B. Majmudar & A.P. Bhangale, JJ
Dated : 25th JANUARY, 2012
This matter was dismissed for want of prosecution on 15/04/2009 and same was restored on 18/8/2009.
Thereafter, on 11th January, 2012, this Court passed the following order.
“None present for the petitioner.
We give last chance to the learned counsel for the petitioner to remain present and argue the matter.
Adjourned to 23/01/2012.”
Today also, when the matter is called out, none appears for the petitioner. Hence, the matter is dismissed in default. Rule is discharged.
JUDGE JUDGE
Punde
Dr. Sandip
The State of Maharashtra
P. B. Majmudar
A. P. Bhangale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
