Dismissed

Sundrabai Dhondiba Kakde v. the State of Mah and Ors.

Bombay HC11 Oct 2012WP/6732/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment parlays four writ petitions challenging non-enhancement of compensation. The Court held that since reference applications for enhancement are pending and alternate remedies exist, the Writ Petitions were misconceived and require no interference.

What did the court decide?

Directions were not issued to award any amount; petitions were disposed without interference.

Sundrabai Dhondiba Kakde Vs the State of Mah and Ors. — Execution and Attachment | Bombay HC (2012)

¶1

wp6561.12

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶5

 WRIT PETITION NO.6561 OF 2012

¶6

Murlidhar s/o Laxman Ghodke,
R/o-Village Pardari,
Tq. & Dist-Aurangabad.

¶7

...PETITIONER.

¶8

 VERSUS

¶9

The State of Maharashtra,
Through Collector, Aurangabad,
and others.

¶10

...RESPONDENTS.

¶11

...

¶12

 Shri.A.R. Borulkar Advocate for Petitioner.
 Shri.S.V. Kurundkar, Government Pleader for
 Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

¶13

 Shri. Umakant Patil Advocate for Respondent
 Nos. 3 and 4.

¶14

...

¶15

WITH

¶16

WRIT PETITION NO.6562 OF 2012

¶17

Vitthal s/o Laxman Ghodke,
R/o-Village Pardari,
Tq. & Dist-Aurangabad.

¶18

...PETITIONER.

¶19

 VERSUS

¶20

wp6561.12

¶21

¶22

The State of Maharashtra,
Through Collector, Aurangabad,
and others.

¶23

...RESPONDENTS.

¶24

 ...
 Shri.A.R. Borulkar Advocate for Petitioner.
 Shri.S.V. Kurundkar, Government Pleader for
 Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

¶25

 Shri. Umakant Patil Advocate for Respondent
 Nos. 3 and 4.

¶26

...

¶27

 WITH

¶28

 WRIT PETITION NO.6566 OF 2012

¶29

Eknath s/o Maruti Dinde,
R/o-Village Pardari,
Tq. & Dist-Aurangabad.
...PETITIONER.

¶30

 VERSUS

¶31

The State of Maharashtra,
Through Collector, Aurangabad,
and others.
...RESPONDENTS.

¶32

 ...
 Shri.A.R. Borulkar Advocate for Petitioner.
 Shri.V.H. Dighe, A.G.P. for Respondent
 Nos. 1 and 2.
 Shri. Umakant Patil Advocate for Respondent
 Nos. 3 and 4.
 ...

¶33

 WITH

¶34

wp6561.12

¶35

¶36

WRIT PETITION NO.6732 OF 2012

¶37

Sunderbai w/o Dhondiba Kakde,
R/o-Village Pardari,
Tq. & Dist-Aurangabad.
...PETITIONER.

¶38

 VERSUS

¶39

The State of Maharashtra,
Through Collector, Aurangabad,
and others.

¶40

...RESPONDENTS.

¶41

 ...
 Shri.A.R. Borulkar Advocate for Petitioner.
 Shri.V.H. Dighe, A.G.P. for Respondent
 Nos. 1 and 2.
 Shri. Umakant Patil Advocate for Respondent
 Nos. 3 and 4.
 ...

¶42

CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND
 A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ.

¶43

 DATE : 11TH OCTOBER, 2012.

¶44

PER COURT :

¶45

1.Heard learned counsel appearing for the
respective parties.
2.ThePetitioners'referencesfor

¶46

wp6561.12

¶47

¶48

enhancement of compensation are pending before the
Reference Court. The Petitioners' contention is

¶49

that connected matters were settled in Lok Adalat.
The Petitioners contend that on identical basis,
directions be issued to the Respondents, to award
same amount to the Petitioners.

¶50

3. The Petitions are misconceived. The
Petitioners have alternate remedies. In exercise
of extra ordinary writ jurisdiction of this Court
under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of
India, no interference is warranted. The Writ
Petitions are disposed of.

¶51

[A.B. CHAUDHARI, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.]

¶52

asb/OCT12

Sundrabai Dhondiba Kakde v. the State of Mah and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sundrabai Dhondiba Kakde v. the State of Mah and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shreya Baburao Ambhore, Minor U/G Baburao Dagduji Ambhore Vs the State of Mah and Ors.

Sulochanabai Fakirrao Kathawate Thr Gpa Balasaheb Fakirrao Kathwate and Ors. Vs the State of Mah and Ors.

Dinkar Narsinhrao Patil-Pawar and Ors. Vs the State of Mah and Ors.

Eknath Maruti Dinde Vs the State of Mah and Ors.

Vitthal Laxman Ghodke Vs the State of Mah and Ors.

Murlidhar Laxman Ghodke Vs the State of Mah and Ors.