Petitioner challenged the lower court's condonation of delay order, arguing the delay was 39 days instead of 29. The High Court found no perversity in the trial court's positive use of discretion and rejected the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.6447 OF 2012
Sou.Janabai Babu Kunakekar Vs.
...Petitioner
Shri.Dattatraya Bhairu Chechar & Anr. ...Respondents
Mr.Prashant S.Bhavake for petitioner.
CORAM : N.M. JAMDAR J. DATE : 27 August, 2012.
P.C.:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2
order passed by the Civil Judge be set aside.
(N.M.JAMDAR, J.)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
M/s. Ware's Education Trust and Anr. Vs. Sunita S. Shinde & Anr.Referred¶12
M/s. Ware's Education Trust and Anr. Vs. Sunita S. Shinde & Anr. - 2008 (6) All M.R. 117
Novita Tukaram Mangle Vs. Saibaba Shikshan Prasarak MandalReferred¶12
Novita Tukaram Mangle Vs. Saibaba Shikshan Prasarak Mandal - 2008 (5) Mh.L.J. 618 · Who else cites this
Sujana Bai Babu Kunakekar
Dattatraya Bhairu Chechar
Anr
N.M. JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
