Disposed

Dusane Education Society, Dusane Thr Secretary v. the State of Mah and Ors.

Bombay HC3 Oct 2012WP/6307/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the petitioner sought a direction to the State Government to consider a proposal for starting a college. The Court noted that a college at the same location had already been started by another institution and was cancelled. The Court held it was for the State Government to decide based on policy and merits without expressing an opinion on the proposal, and disposed of the wr

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of without any direction to the State Government.

Dusane Education Society, Dusane Thr Secretary Vs… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2012)

¶1

wp6307.12

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶5

 WRIT PETITION NO.6307 OF 2012

¶6

Dusane Education Society, Dusane,
Tq-Sakri, Dist-Dhule,
Through its Secretary.

¶7

...PETITIONER.

¶8

 VERSUS

¶9

The State of Maharashtra,
Higher & Technical Education
Department, Mantralaya Extension
Building, Mumbai-400 032
and others.

¶10

...RESPONDENTS.

¶11

 ...
 Shri.R.J. Godbole Advocate for Petitioner.
 Shri.V.D. Godbharle, A.G.P. for Respondent
 Nos. 1 and 5.
 Shri.A.B. Girase Advocate for Respondent
 Nos. 2, 4 and 6.
 Shri. V.D. Hon Advocate for Respondent No.3.
 ...

¶12

CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND
 A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ.

¶13

 DATE : 3RD OCTOBER, 2012.

¶14

wp6307.12

¶15

¶16

PER COURT :

¶17

1.Heard learned counsel appearing for the
respective parties.

¶18

2.The learned A.G.P., on instructions,

¶19

submits that permission granted in favour of
Respondent No.3 - Swodharak Vidyarthi Sanstha,
Dhule, to start a college at Dusane, Tq-Sakri,
Dist-Dhule, is cancelled.

¶20

3.Shri. Godbole, learned counsel for the

¶21

Petitioner submits that in view of the statement
made by the learned A.G.P., the State Government

¶22

be directed to consider the proposal filed by the
Petitioner for starting college at Dusane.

¶23

4.It is for the State Government to take

¶24

decision in accordance with the policy and the
merits. It is clarified that this Court has not
expressed any opinion in respect of the proposal

¶25

wp6307.12

¶26

¶27

filed by the Petitioner for starting college at

¶28

Dusane. With these observations, the Writ Petition
is disposed of.

¶29

[A.B. CHAUDHARI, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.]

¶30

asb/OCT12

Dusane Education Society, Dusane Thr Secretary v. the State of Mah and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dusane Education Society, Dusane Thr Secretary v. the State of Mah and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shailendra Vasant Panpatil Vs the State of Mah and Ors.

Muzfar Abbas Mohd Dildar Ali and Ors. Vs the State of Mah and Ors.

Shyam Balu Bomod Vs the State of Mah and Ors.

Sushma Baliram Rakshe Vs Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and Ors.

Girish Sheshrao Gaikwad and Ors. Vs the State of Mah and Ors.

M/S Venkatesh Oil Agencies Thr. Its Partner Vs the State of Mah and Ors.