The petitioner challenged the revised rule of the election programme. The court held that the relief sought cannot be granted under Article 226.
Writ petition disposed of as infructuous; contentions kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2501wp6082.11.odt
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION No.6082 of 2011.
Abhijit Anandrao Adsul
..vs..
Election Commission through its Secretary M.S.Mumbai and anr.
=-=-==-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judges Order
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Mr. D.M.Upadhye, Adv. for the petitioner. Mrs.B.Dangre, AGP for resp.no.1. Mr.Marpakwar Adv. for respondent no.2.
C ORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR AND
A.P.BHANGALE, JJ.
DATED:25th JANUARY, 2012.
The petitioner has challenged the revised Rule of election programme. Such a relief cannot be given under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
In view of this, the petition cannot be allowed to be entertained. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
All contentions raised in this petition are kept open. The petitioners may take appropriate remedy available in law.
JUDGE JUDGE.
chute
2501wp6082.11.odt 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether relief can be granted under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the revised rule of an election programme.
Abhijit Anandrao Adsul
Election Commission through its Secretary M.S.Mumbai
Er. Popatrao Balaji Khane and others
P.B.Majmudar
A.P.Bhangale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court