The High Court at Nagpur disposed of a writ petition as infructuous because the election had already concluded. No relief under Article 226 could be granted. Contentions were kept open for further remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2501wp6079.11.odt
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION No.6079 of 2011.
Sau.Sunita Kishor Bhagwat
..vs..
State of Mah. through its Secretary Ministry of Urban Delp.Deptt.and ors.
=-=-==-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Court's or Judges Order Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Mrs.B.Dangre, AGP for resp.1,3 and 4.
Mr.Marpakwar Adv. for respondent no.2.
C ORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR AND
A.P.BHANGALE, JJ.
DATED:25th JANUARY, 2012.
The learned counsel for the petitioner is not present.
It is informed to us that election is already over.
Considering the prayer made in the petition, no relief can be
granted under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
In view of this, petition has become infructuous and same is
disposed of as infructuous.
All contentions raised in this petition are kept open. The petitioner may take appropriate remedy available in law.
JUDGE.
JUDGE
2
2501wp6079.11.odt
chute
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition should be disposed of as infructuous due to the completion of the election.
Sau.Sunita Kishor Bhagwat
State of Mah. through its Secretary
P.B.Majmudar
A.P.Bhangale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court