Petitioner challenged in a criminal writ petition. The Assistant Public Prosecutor stated that police had not visited the petitioner's office but would act if illegalities were found. The petition was disposed of without further elaboration.
Writ Petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP 593.12.sxw
1
JPP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 593 OF 2012
Shubhangi Sanskrutik Krida Mandal.
... Petitioner.
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
... Respondents.
Mr. Anand S. Patil for the Petitioner. Ms. A.A. Mane, APP for the State.
CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.
DATED : 21st NOVEMBER 2012.
P.C. :-
Learned APP submits that the Police concerned have not visited the office of the Petitioner, however, if illegalities noticed, they will take appropriate steps. Writ Petition disposed of.
(K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.)
Shubhangi Sanskrutik Krida Mandal
The State of Maharashtra
K.U. CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
