This is a one-line order in a writ petition where the respondent stated it would consider the application and communicate a decision. The court held the cause of action did not survive and disposed of the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 54 OF 2012
DEEPAK MAHABALESHWAR GHARSE ., ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF GOA THROUGH THE UNDER SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents
Mr. J. E. Coelho Pereira, Senior Advocate with Mr. V. Braganza, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Mr. A. Kamat, Advocate for respondents.
Coram:A. P. LAVANDE & U. V. BAKRE, JJ.
Date:18th January, 2012
P.C.
Heard Mr. J. E. Coelho Pereira, learned Senior Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. S. S. Kantak, learned Advocate General on behalf of the respondents. Mr. A. Kamat, Additional Government Advocate waives notice on behalf of the respondents.
petition stands disposed of.
A. P. LAVANDE, J.
U. V. BAKRE, J.
vn
Deepak Mahabaleshwar Gharse
State of Goa
A. P. Lavande
U. V. Bakre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
