Disposed
Raja Rangnathrao Salve and Anr. v. the State of Mah and Anr.
Bombay HCWP/531/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 531 OF 2012
Raja Rangnathrao Salve & another PETITIONERS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & another RESPONDENTS
.....
Mr. A.R. Salve, advocate for the Petitioners.
Mr. V.D. Rakh, A.G.P. for the Respondent-State.
Mr. C.V. Thombre, advocate for Respondent No. 2.
.....
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND
M.T. JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : 23rd JANUARY, 2012
ORAL ORDER:
In view of the statement made by the learned
counsel for the respondent No. 2, on instructions,
that the respondents are issuing fresh advertisement
for the plot in question, no orders are necessary to
be passed in the petition. The petition is disposed
of as such.
[M.T. JOSHI, J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.]
npj/wp531-11
Raja Rangnathrao Salve
The State of Maharashtra
B.R. Gavai
M.T. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court