High Court Bench at Aurangabad disposed of the petition by directing the Respondent No.1 to consider the petitioners' application for sugar-selling permission expeditiously, specifically within 4 weeks.
Directed respondent No.1 to decide petitioners' application for permission to sell sugar within 4 weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 508 OF 2012 "Terna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. Dhoki Vs. The Union of India and others."
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram or directions and Registrar's orders. appearances, Court's Orders
1
Mr. V.D. Sapkal, Advocate h/f. Mr. L.C. Patil, Advocate for petitioner.
Mr. Alok Sharma, ASG for respondent nos. 1 to 4. Mr. K.M. Suryawanshi, AGP for respondent No.5
CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATE :- 24TH JANUARY , 2012.
PER COURT :-
1] The petitioners are restricting their claim in the petition for a direction to the respondent No.1 for deciding the application filed by the petitioners for permission to sell sugar.
2] Petitions are disposed of with direction to the respondent No.1 to consider and decide the representation filed by the petitioners, as expeditiously as possible and in any case, within 4 weeks from today.
grt/-
Terna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. Dhoki
The Union of India
GAVAI, B.R. J.
JOSHI, M.T. J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
