The single-judge bench dismissed Writ Petition No.50 of 2012 for lack of instructions from the petitioner's counsel, characterizing the matter as non-prosecuted.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
0503wp50.12.odt
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION No.50 of 2012.
Ambadas Rohya Pawar
..vs..
Beby Arjun Dandeet and others.
=-=-==-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Court's or Judges Order Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Mr. T.R.Darda, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr. D.B.Yengal, AGP for resp.2 and 3.
C ORAM: S.A.BOBDE AND
P.B.VARALE, JJ.
DATED: 5th MARCH, 2012.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has no
instructions in the matter.
Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
JUDGE JUDGE.
chute
0503wp50.12.odt 2
Ambadas Rohya Pawar
Beby Arjun Dandeet and others.
S.A.BOBDE
P.B.VARALE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court