Petitioner Sarpanch challenged a no confidence motion passed by Gram Panchayat members. Court upheld impugned orders dismissing the challenge, finding motion passed by requisite majority with proper procedure followed by authorities.
Writ petition dismissed. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 W.P. 497.2012
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 497 OF 2012
Office Notes,Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram,appearances, ................................ Court's orders or CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J. directions and Registrar's orders DATE : 17/01/2012.
Mr. S.S.Gangakhedkar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. M.P. Kale, Advocate for Resp. Nos.3 to 8.
PER COURT :
2 W.P. 497.2012
Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition.
3 W.P. 497.2012
[ S.V. GANGAPURWALA,J. ]
KNP/W.P. 497.2012
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the no confidence motion proceedings were vitiated due to improper format of requisition and non-service of notices.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Nandkheda
Members of Gram Panchayat Nandkheda
S.V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
