The writ petition was found premature as no adverse order had been passed against the petitioner at the relevant stage, so it was dismissed without entertaining the matter.
None. Petition dismissed as premature.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
WP 434/12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WP No. 434 of 2012 Yunus v. ZP and ors
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders.
Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr M. Dadar, Adv for petitioner Coram: P. B. Majmudar and A. P. Bhangale, JJ Dated: 27th January 2012
2 WP 434/12
to the petitioner to approach this Court as and when cause of action arises in future.
Judge Judge
joshi
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition challenging the authority without an adverse order was maintainable.
Yunus
ZP
P. B. Majmudar
A. P. Bhangale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
