The High Court of Bombay, Appellate Side, disposed of Writ Petition No. 4216 of 2011 as withdrawn on account of the petitioner seeking liberty to pursue the substantive issue.
Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to take all such steps as available in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
skc
WP-4216-11
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO. 4216 OF 2011
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s Orders
Mr. Hiten Venegavkar for Petitioner. Mrs. M. P. Thakur - Assistant Government Pleader for State – Respondent No. 1. Mr. S. R. Ganbavale for Respondent No. 2.
CORAM : D. D. SINHA AND
SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ.
04 January 2012
P.C. :
Counsel for the Petitioner seeks
permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to take all such steps in respect of the issue involved in the present writ petition in accordance with law.
In the circumstances, writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for if otherwise available in law.
(D. D. SINHA, J.)
(SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
Manoj Chaitanya Suryawanshi
State
Assistant Government Pleader
D. D. Sinha
V. K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
