Petitioners filed a writ petition. Respondent counsel stated auction proceedings were cancelled. Petitioner counsel sought to withdraw the petition, which was allowed.
Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PTITION NO. 4171/2012
BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD AND ANOTHER VS.
SAMTA NAGRI SAH. PATSANSTHA MARYADIT, KOPARGAON AND OTHERS
Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Shri S.D. Kulkarni, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri A.S. Gandhi, Advocate for respondents Nos.1 & 2 Shri B.V. Wagh, A.G.P. for respondent No.6. Shri S.R. Deshpande, Advocate for respondents 3 to 5.
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.
DATED : 22nd AUGUST, 2012
auction proceeding pursuant to the auction notice dated 04/05/2012 in respect of Gat No. 403 has been cancelled.
(S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J. )
ts k/
BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD AND ANOTHER
SAMTA NAGRI SAH. PATSANSTHA MARYADIT, KOPARGAON AND OTHERS
S.V. GANGAPURWALA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
