Sanjay Navnath Nagargoje v. the State of Mah and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous upon the counsel for the petitioner stating that the matter had become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 W.P. 4083 of 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Writ Petition No.4083 of 2010
Sanjay s/o. Navnath Nagargoje. .. Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Others. .. Respondents.
Smt. M.S. Shendage, Advocate, holding for Smt. Asha S Rasal, Advocate, for petitioner.
Shri. S.N. Kendre, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent No.1.
CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & S.B. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE 3rd MAY 2012 PER COURT :
Sd/- Sd/-
(S.B. DESHMUKH, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.)
rsl
Sanjay s/o. Navnath Nagargoje
The State of Maharashtra
NARESH H PATIL
S.B. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court