This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cwp405.10
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.405 OF 2010
OfficeNotes,Office Court’s or Judge’s Orders
MemorandaofCoram,
appearances,Court’s
orders or directions and
Registrar’s orders.
Shri. D.A. Naik Advocate for Petitioner.
Shri.V.D. Rakh, A.P.P. for Resp. No.2.
....
CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL, J.
DATE : 30TH JANUARY, 2012.
1. Shri. Naik, learned counsel for
the Petitioner submits that due to efflux
of time, the Petition has become
infructuous and therefore, he seeks leave
to withdraw the Writ Petition. Leave
granted. The Writ Petition is dismissed
as withdrawn.
[NARESH H.PATIL,J.]
asb/JAN12
Petitioner
Resp. No.2
NARESH H.PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court