In a writ petition, the Bombay High Court dismissed the petition against an interlocutory order rejecting the respondent's application for production of documents. The court held no exception could be taken to the reasons provided.
The writ petition under WP No. 4021 of 2012 is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp-4021.12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.4021 OF 2012
Raju Lakhomal Hazari : Petitioner. Versus Gopal Lakhomal Hazari : Respondent.
Mr. A N Mulla for the Petitioner.
CORAM : R. M. SAVANT, J. DATE : 18th October 2012
P.C.
1 The Application filed by the Defendants for production of the documents by the Plaintiff has been rejected for the reasons mentioned in the impugned order. In my view, no exception could be taken to the said reasons. The order being interlocutory in nature, no interference is called for. The above Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed.
[R.M.SAVANT, J]
1 of 1
lgc
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the interlocutory order rejecting the application for production of documents.
Raju Lakhomal Hazari
Gopal Lakhomal Hazari
R. M. Savant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
