On the petitioners' application for leave to withdraw Writ Petition No.3925 of 2012, the Court granted leave. The petition was subsequently rejected as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the writ petition granted; petition rejected as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1}
W.P.No.3925/2012
drp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.3925 OF 2012
Gajanan Sukhdeo Palkar & Others PETITIONERS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & Another
RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. V.V.Bhavthankar, Advocate for the petitioners
Mr. S.D.Kaldate, AGP for respondent State
Mr. Rajendra Deshmukh, Advocate for respondent No.2
.......
PER COURT:
1.Learnedcounselappearingforthe
petitioners, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw
the writ petition. Leave granted. Petition is rejected
as withdrawn.
drp/A12/wp3925-12
Gajanan Sukhdeo Palkar & Others
The State of Maharashtra
Another
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court