This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp365.08
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.365 OF 2008
OfficeNotes,Office Court’s or Judge’s Orders
MemorandaofCoram,
appearances,Court’s
orders or directions and
Registrar’s orders.
Shri.R.R. Suryawanshi Advocate for
Petitioner.
Shri.V.G. Shelke, A.G.P. for Resp. Nos. 1
and 2.
Shri. Vivek Bhavthankar Advocate for
Resp. No.3.
....
CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND
S.B. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE : 4TH MAY, 2012.
1. Heard. Shri. Suryawanshi, learned
counsel for the Petitioner submits that
the Petition has become infructuous. The
Writ Petition is disposed of as
infructuous.
[S.B. DESHMUKH,J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.]
asb/MAY12
Petitioner
Respondents 1 and 2
Respondent 3
NARESH H. PATIL
S.B. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court