Disposed

Geeta Sudhakar Gundala v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC22 Oct 2012WP/3597/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single bench order in Writ Petition No. 3597 of 2011. Bench issued a direction to the Chief Executive Officer of Zilla Parishad, Latur, to decide a representation on merits within four months, granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Latur to decide representation within four months after opportunity of hearing.

Geeta Sudhakar Gundala Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors. — Bombay HC (2012) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 wp3597.11

¶2

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.3597 OF 2011

¶5

[ Geeta Sudhakar Gundala vs. The State of Mah. & Ors. ]

¶6

`Office Notes, Office` `Memoranda of Coram,`	`Court’s or Judge’s orders`
`appearances, Court’s` `orders or directions` `and Registrar’s` `orders`
	`Mr. Manish P. Tripathi, Advocate for` `petitioner.`
	`Mr. S.G. Nandedkar, AGP for respondent` `State/Authorities.`
	`CORAM : R.M. BORDE, &` `S.S. SHINDE, JJ.` `DATE : 22ND OCTOBER, 2012`
	`PER COURT :`
	`. The petitioner is seeking direction`
	`for` `expeditious` `decision` `on` `the`
	`representation tendered by him to the Chief`
	`Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Latur on`
	`8th November, 2010.`
	`2. Considering the grievance set forth`
	`in the writ petition, writ petitions stands`
	`disposed of with a direction to respondent`

¶7

2 wp3597.11 No.3 Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Latur to take decision on the representation tendered by the petitioner on 8th November, 2010, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within period of four months from today, after extending opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 3. Pending civil application, if any, does not survive, hence same stands disposed of. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] [R.M. BORDE, J.]

¶8

sut/OCT12

Geeta Sudhakar Gundala v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Geeta Sudhakar Gundala v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shatkarni Vimukt Prabhodini Sanstha Aurangabad through President Vs the State of Mahrashtra and Anr.

Maulana Abdul Kalam Azad Education and Welfare So Vs the State of Mah and Ors.

Shivpratap Samajik Mahila Mandal Bukanwadi Dist Osmanabad through President Vs the State of Mahrashtra and Ors.

Bhaskar Datta Pawar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Manikrao Tulshiram Kale and Anr. Vs the State of Mah and Ors.

Anand Nivrutti Kunke and Ors. Vs the State of Mah and Ors.