The petition was dismissed for default as no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner, despite the matter being called out twice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.306 of 2012.
Anita Hiralal Akotkar
..vs..
The State of Mah. through the Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur and anr.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram Court's or Judges Order appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
C ORAM: P.V.HARDAS AND
M.L.TAHALIYANI, JJ. DATED : 16th JULY, 2012.
None had appeared on behalf of the petitioner though this
petition is called out twice. In that light of the matter, petition is dismissed for default.
JUDGE JUDGE.
chute
2
Anita Hiralal Akotkar
The State of Mah. through the Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur and anr.
P.V.HARDAS
M.L.TAHALIYANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
